Progress with economy.

Quiet Babylon


Gradual Calamity

Thursday January 7, 2010 by Tim Maly

1.

There is a possibly apocryphal story about a conversation on the subject of the solar system between Wittgenstein and a student. Wittgenstein asks the student why early people thought that the sun went around the earth. The student says that it’s because it looks that way. Wittgenstein asks, “And how would it look if the earth went around the sun?”

Scars of the Boom 1

2.

In 1997, a real-estate bubble driven by financial speculation in the Asian Tiger economies reached its peak and burst. The resulting crash sparked international panic, threatening to bring down the world economy. In Thailand, construction halted on dozens of massive projects. 13 years later, those buildings are still standing.

Ban Phe is a fishing village about 2 hours outside of Bangkok. Look it up in travel guides and they will confidently tell you that the only reason you’ll be there is to catch a ferry to Ko Samet, a popular vacation island. There are at least 7 massive resorts within a 15-minute scooter drive. Nearly all are unfinished and abandoned. They tower incongruously over the countryside. The total capacity would have been in the tens-of-thousands.

3.

The Skyscraper Index posits that record-breaking construction projects are indicators of an irrationally exuberant economy and harbingers of doom.

4.

Up close, the Thai resorts are being slowly reclaimed by the jungle.

Scars of the Boom 4

These are not slap-dash projects. They were well funded and carefully designed. They would have been nice places. Rooftop patios overlook what would have been ornate pools.

5.

*We’ve long had a term of art for old buildings that are ruined: they’re called “ruins.”

*However, we lack a term of art for “ruins” that are actually buildings never completed. Sometimes they’re completed buildings that are never sold, and therefore they start falling over before they were ever inhabited. This would be the American real-estate bust version of the phenomenon.

*Another version is the abandoned, incomplete high-rise. Commonly a steel and cement framework is erected (because that’s pretty easy), and then there’s some legal or economic brouhaha and the builders just down tools and walk off. In Brazil a skeleton framework of this kind is called a “squelette.”

Bruce Sterling Ruins of the Present

Scars of the Boom 10 Scars of the Boom 5

6.

The post-apocalypse is a comforting fantasy. It implies that things will only ever get that bad due to catastrophe. We say Detroit looks like a post-apocalyptic city because we are really bad at conceptualizing decline. Detroit got that way gradually.

“How would it look if it had just slowly fallen apart?”

7.

What would it have been like to live through the fall of Rome? You’d have been very old. The decline of the Roman Empire took 320 years. That’s 12 generations of people. Did each generation say that things used to be better in the old days? They were right, I suppose.

8.

When then end came to Thailand’s boom, somewhere an architecture firm – perhaps specializing in premium exotic locations – quietly removed all reference to certain projects from their portfolio.

Scars of the Boom 11 Scars of the Boom 12

9.

In Towards Hackable Architecture, Ethan Zuckerman considers the problem that architects face when they are asked by people with more money than sense to envision insane projects, in this case, building a hotel that is “Dubai meets Disney in Dakar”.

Many of the teams fought the question, arguing that the goal was to persuade the developer that the only way to compete in a global market was combining luxury with responsibility. But my favorite response came from an architect who referenced the ideas of creative reuse in my talk and said, “Build the hotel. Assume it’s going to fail and be left to fall apart. How do you build a building so that it can be hacked after the fact?”

Ethan Zuckerman Towards Hackable Architecture

10.

In my mind, there are two images of the Coliseum. The first is of the contemporary ruin. The second is of gladiators, lions, and Christians. But the last gladiatorial fights happened in 435 and the modern ruin wasn’t fully excavated until the 1930s.

That’s 1,500 years of neglect and adaptive re-use that aren’t part of the cultural picture of the building. Here are some things that happened: A church was built into the side; it was fortified and possibly used as a castle; a religious order lived in the northern third from the 1350s to the 1800s (what was happening in the other two thirds?); they considered turning it into a wool factory; they used it briefly for bullfights.

11.

*Occasionally squatters move into “squelettes” and bring in some breeze-block, corrugated tin and plastic hoses, transforming squelettes into high-rise favelas. This doesn’t work very well because it’s tough to manage the utilities, especially the water.

Bruce Sterling Ruins of the Present

Scars of the Boom 7

12.

There are many more ruins than there have been cataclysms.


 
  • chrisarkenberg
    In Bangkok, I noted many very tall and very empty skeletal hotels, washed and ossified and streaked with their own slow undoing. Hauntingly beautiful to a fellow architecture (and apocalyptica) buff like myself. On the ground level, as you note, the city persists with constant effort against the ever-encroaching jungle. Everything is in a suspended state of erosion and rot - a design pattern that reflects across much of the urban landscape, always seemingly in motion, lashing re-used goods to trucks and skiffs and tenements, as if keeping it all from washing away in the Chao Phraya or being resorbed by the creeping liana.
  • Martin McG
    Really interesting piece...

    "The decline of the Roman Empire took 320 years. That’s 12 generations of people. Did each generation say that things used to be better in the old days? They were right, I suppose."

    Actually the Romans were going on about declining standards for far more than 320 years - Cicero made a career out of complaining about declining standards in the first century BCE - and he eas hardly the first.
  • Picking how long to call the decline of the Roman Empire is necessarily an exercise in arbitrariness. On the one hand, you've got the Eastern Empire which is going strong until the 1400s. On the other hand, you've got people like Cicero and, you know, everyone who's a conservative claiming that things used to be better in the old days.

    The dates I picked were the Wikipedian consensus (for what that's worth) running from the zenith of Rome under Julius Caesar to the arrival of Odoacer in the 470s.

    The main point is that it took a really long time. It took Rome longer to fall than it took the British Empire to rise and fall again.
  • How do we know that ruins ever were "finished" buildings?

    How do we know that present day squelette-ready sites are not "finished" buildings?

    Is a building always in a state of building, and a ruin always in a state of ruination?

    What ruins a building, and what builds a building?

    What builds a ruin, and what ruins a ruin?

    What is the qualification for "abandoned"?

    Is the purpose of a building to be used for the purpose it was designed for?

    Is any building abandoned by its owner, at any stage in its building/use, qualification to be a failed building?

    Are ruins purposeless? Who owns ruins? Do ruins suit these new tenants?

    Buildings hold purposes, ruins hold questions and secrets. Or is it the other way around?
blog comments powered by Disqus