Crushing abundance.

Quiet Babylon

3 Stories About Regional Architecture

Monday July 27, 2009 || by Tim Maly

The End of 2008
Creative Commons License photo credit: tripleman

Over at Inventing Green, Alexis Madrigal looks at the adoption of air-conditioners. He talks about how the rise of electrical cooling seems to have lead to a crash in regional building techniques.

“Of course, the use of air conditioning allowed homeowners to enjoy a new degree of comfort, but a goodly portion of the residential air-conditioning load simply replaced the comfort once provided — at little environmental cost — by good design,” Rome writes.

The whole thing put me in mind of three incidents that highlight the critical importance of a regional context in usable architecture.

  1. Done Well

    A few years ago I went on a tour of the then under-construction Earth Rangers Wildlife Center in Ontario. It’s a very green building, LEED gold rating and all that. They were showing us the tech and how liquid running through the building kept it cool and how tall ceilings moved hot air away from employees and on and on about how they were keeping the temperature down. This is Canada, where the main problem, you’d think, is keeping warm. Judging by my utility bills, it certainly is.

    One of the students asked the project manager about that and he looked genuinely surprised. Heating was an afterthought, a solved problem – you just needed to keep the place insulated. And then he went back to explaining all the clever cooling solutions.

  2. Done Badly

    I remember visiting my parents when they were house-sitting on Salt Spring Island. The proud owners had their home custom built, using a design from California. The result was an unusable disaster.

    Everything about the house had clearly been intended to keep a desert home pleasantly shaded. An overabundance of sunlight is not a problem in heavily-treed, often cloudy, British Columbia. They had to keep the indoor lights on pretty much all day long. Even so, the house felt dank, dark and dismal.

  3. Done Badly, Then Fixed

    In Halifax, I used to deliver the paper to the Killam Library. The Killam had originally been designed with some warmer climate in mind (all my stories are about how miserable the weather gets in Canada, I’m realizing). Touches such as an always-dry stream bed that ran from outside the building under the edge into the open air atrium and then into the lobby itself, indicated an architect who imagined a place where water did not freeze for a good chunk of the year.

    During the winter, that open-air atrium became a terrifying safety hazard. Take a look at this photo. Surrounded on all sides by warmed glass, the whole thing became a chimney. The heating pushed an enormous volume of air out the top and sucked gale force winds through the pictured entry-way.

    In the late 90s, Dalhousie fixed the problem, sealing the top of the atrium with glass. The result was a fully usable (safe) courtyard where students now congregate.

  4. So much depends on thoughtful design.


Filed under: architecture, context, criticism, design ||
  • Lex
    I'm from Arizona, originally. The cold part of Arizona. Flagstaff, Arizona often stays below freezing for weeks at a time (I know that sounds paltry to Canadian ears) and can get substantial snowfall (again, substantial for Arizona). We had city-wide problems with businesses hiring architecture firms from Phoenix, AZ, where it almost never gets below freezing and certainly never snows. They would consistently build flat roofs on buildings. Whenever a big, heavy snow came along, some roof would collapse somewhere in town.

    Later, I moved to Tucson (the hot part of Arizona). It is interesting to look at different architectural styles around town. Lots of old homes are built adobe-style: thick walls made of some sort of mud/brick material, and coated in a pale dust color to reflect sunlight. Many of the really old homes have a sort of shaded loft up on the roof where people used to sleep in the summertime. If you got up to a breezy place at night, it was beautiful. These days, more and more low-income houses are so poorly insulated and made with such poor building materials that people are actually being cooked to death when their air conditioning unit breaks.

    Cars coming standard with air conditioning changed the schedule and culture of the town. My mom remembers Tucson having a rich summer nightlife in the 60s and 70s. Kids would cruise up and down the streets with their windows down and music blasting. Now everybody keeps their windows up and their A/C cranked high.
  • I have a question about this that you may be able to answer.

    I'd heard that the adobe-style homes that were being built now were often only cosmetically adobe-style. So they sort of looked like the old buildings to fit in visually without actually having any of the climate-appropriate features. Is this what you're talking about in Tucson?
  • Lex
    Pretty much exactly.

    Adobe used to be made of sun-dried earthen bricks. The walls were thick, the houses were fairly low, and the effect was kind of like a house built half-underground-- well-regulated temperatures and dark (but that's a good thing when the sun is so intense). The roofs were flat partially to catch rain water for drinking and watering plants. Also, if it rained and then evaporated off the roof, the whole roof acted as a swamp cooler.

    Nowadays, when a house is built as an "adobe"-style home, it's usually concrete and drywall, with a layer of chicken wire and then a layer of textured plaster to coat the outside. So it looks adobe, but it has none of the benefits-- the roof often doesn't collect and distribute water, it's just as hot as a regular house without the thick walls. The fake adobe houses are better than the mobile homes, but really everything is better than an aluminum oven.

    Of course, there is a growing community of people who are reverting more toward the old style of doing things-- with some modern touches. It's not so strange to see an adobe house (real adobe) with solar panels on the roof and effective rain-catching system. Yay sustainability!

    Also, studies have shown that houses painted lavender reflect sunlight better than houses painted white.
  • I want to see those studies!
blog comments powered by Disqus