Everything adapts.

Quiet Babylon


6 Homes of the Future

July 31st, 2009 by Tim Maly

Here are 6 videos spanning 50 years of predictions about our glorious technological future at home. What I love about all of these are the incidental predictions that need to happen when the videos are put together. They want to make promises about future technology and materials but they can’t help but imply various thing about how society will evolve. For instance, the 1997 Microsoft video which features a kid researching for a project doesn’t see Wikipedia coming at all (neither did Microsoft).

  1. 1957: Monsanto Plastics

    Oh visions of the future from the 1950s, why must you have so much back-handed sexism?

  2. 1980: Xanadu

    I really want to know what was going through the minds of the committee that decided that the first robot you should meet should be the murderous HAL from 2001.

  3. 1988: Ameritech

    There are a lot of predictions that seem accurate if you sort of squint a little. One that wasn’t was that Ameritech would still exist. (Via the excellent paleofuture.)


    The Electronic Home

  4. 1997: Microsoft

    In the future, you will still be watching Oprah.

  5. 2008: Samsung

    I am pleased that in the future, the lead-in feature of RFID involves organizing your recipes.

  6. 2008: Adaptive Path and Mozilla Labs

    Adaptive Path decides to hitch their future horse to the New York Times, Yahoo, MapQuest, Amazon, and Google brands. I wonder how many of those will make it.



    Aurora (complete video without commentary) from Adaptive Path on Vimeo.

Fun activity: Predict what predictions in the last two videos will seem hopelessly naive 10 years from now.

Filed under 6things, futurity having View Comments

Broken Windows: A Terrorist Plot

July 29th, 2009 by Tim Maly

Scala al mercato
Creative Commons License photo credit: Iguana Jo

Published as an article in 1982, the Broken Windows theory is the the idea that the little things are what make the difference between an orderly and a crime-ridden city. If you are diligent about cleaning up graffiti and vandalism, then people will be less inclined to cause trouble. Leave damage un-repaired and you send the message that no one cares. And then…

We suggest that “untended” behavior also leads to the breakdown of community controls. A stable neighborhood of families who care for their homes, mind each other’s children, and confidently frown on unwanted intruders can change, in a few years or even a few months, to an inhospitable and frightening jungle. A piece of property is abandoned, weeds grow up, a window is smashed. Adults stop scolding rowdy children; the children, emboldened, become more rowdy. Families move out, unattached adults move in. Teenagers gather in front of the corner store. The merchant asks them to move; they refuse. Fights occur. Litter accumulates. People start drinking in front of the grocery; in time, an inebriate slumps to the sidewalk and is allowed to sleep it off. Pedestrians are approached by panhandlers.

NYC Police Commissioner William J. Bratton was an adherent and applied the idea in his efforts to combat the crime wave that was sweeping New York in the 1990s. Malcolm Gladwell approvingly covered that story, making it one of the pillars of his argument in The Tipping Point. Despite people like Steven Levitt arguing that correlation is not causation, the theory still holds a lot of sway.

So much for the background.

It’s 2009 and the housing market is in free-fall. American resolve, strengthened in the wake of the 9/11 attacks, redirected and solidified by the HOPEful rhetoric of Obama’s new administration is facing its first test. This is not an external challenge, a threat from the outside carried by insidious invaders. This is an internal failing.

Newsmagazines and pundits are proclaiming the End of Capitalism, or at least the need for Serious Reform. Everyone’s trying to figure out who to blame. Insolvent homeowners or the banks who lent to them. Over-regulation or under-regulation. Democrats or Republicans.

Underlying the whole thing is this nagging thread of doubt. What if American can-do can’t? What if the whole thing has been a bubble? What if the sun has finally set on the American Empire?

There are any number of people who’d like to see the United States fail. Al Qeada and their shadowy financiers, of course. Any of the forgotten domestic terrorists. White supremacists, survivalists, cults, and any number of far-right and far-left organizations. Not to mention the Chinese, Russians or countless James Bond-esque ultra-rich villains.

Somewhere in an office or a cave or a secret volcano base, someone is reading The Tipping Point next to the latest housing figures and a light goes on.

Maps are drawn up, sleeper cells are activated, secret Swiss and Cayman accounts are accessed, and the buying begins. It’s child’s play, really. A matter of ensuring the right density of abandoned housing.

In a lot of cases, the problem takes care of itself. Investment housing that no one actually wanted in the first place, places where no one wants to live. Half-finished bedroom communities and subdivisions. Detroit and the rest of the rust-belt. These areas will devour themselves. Just to be sure, agents buy a few properties for fractions of a penny on the dollar.

Other areas require some finesse. They are generally liveable, often quite nice. Here, it’s a matter of finding the homes belonging to people whose wages don’t match their mortgage payments and who are realizing that their debt outstrips their houses’ value.

It’s very easy to recruit agents to this cause. You don’t need suicidal maniacs, you just need people vaguely in favour of your aims who are willing to pick up the mail from time to time.

Once property is bought, it’s simply a matter of keeping up with property tax payments, knocking out a few windows, and leaving the building to die.

The American system is utterly unable to cope with this attack. The whole rhetoric of the need for things like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac is built on the assumption that homeowners will take care of their land. Even now, measures are being pushed through to protect homeowners who can’t actually afford their homes.

It’s totally legal. People are buying and selling property through normal channels. There is no investigation because there can be no suspicion. It looks like all the rumours of the end of American prosperity are true. Newscasters inadvertently act as force multipliers, broadcasting reports about America’s Decaying Neighbourhoods. Until it’s not news anymore. Until it’s just the way things are.

Some neighbourhoods do resist. Busybody homeowner associations form a kind of local immune system. They fight the tide, calling meetings, filing by-law complaints and struggling to keep their neighbourhoods safe, clean, and free of strangers. It’s exhausting work, and though some neighbourhoods succeed in staving off the damage, most families (worn down by those rowdy children) simply try to move elsewhere. There is nowhere to go.

It’s an engineered crime wave. As security forces helplessly patrol the docks and airports for dirty bombs and terrorist attacks that will never come, America rots from within.

A glimmer of hope: what if Broken Windows is wrong and the whole attack fails? Then the neighbourhood recovers, prices go up and a weapon becomes an investment. Our shadowy attackers sell the houses back at a tidy profit.

3 Stories About Regional Architecture

July 27th, 2009 by Tim Maly

The End of 2008
Creative Commons License photo credit: tripleman

Over at Inventing Green, Alexis Madrigal looks at the adoption of air-conditioners. He talks about how the rise of electrical cooling seems to have lead to a crash in regional building techniques.

“Of course, the use of air conditioning allowed homeowners to enjoy a new degree of comfort, but a goodly portion of the residential air-conditioning load simply replaced the comfort once provided — at little environmental cost — by good design,” Rome writes.

The whole thing put me in mind of three incidents that highlight the critical importance of a regional context in usable architecture.

  1. Done Well

    A few years ago I went on a tour of the then under-construction Earth Rangers Wildlife Center in Ontario. It’s a very green building, LEED gold rating and all that. They were showing us the tech and how liquid running through the building kept it cool and how tall ceilings moved hot air away from employees and on and on about how they were keeping the temperature down. This is Canada, where the main problem, you’d think, is keeping warm. Judging by my utility bills, it certainly is.

    One of the students asked the project manager about that and he looked genuinely surprised. Heating was an afterthought, a solved problem – you just needed to keep the place insulated. And then he went back to explaining all the clever cooling solutions.

  2. Done Badly

    I remember visiting my parents when they were house-sitting on Salt Spring Island. The proud owners had their home custom built, using a design from California. The result was an unusable disaster.

    Everything about the house had clearly been intended to keep a desert home pleasantly shaded. An overabundance of sunlight is not a problem in heavily-treed, often cloudy, British Columbia. They had to keep the indoor lights on pretty much all day long. Even so, the house felt dank, dark and dismal.

  3. Done Badly, Then Fixed

    In Halifax, I used to deliver the paper to the Killam Library. The Killam had originally been designed with some warmer climate in mind (all my stories are about how miserable the weather gets in Canada, I’m realizing). Touches such as an always-dry stream bed that ran from outside the building under the edge into the open air atrium and then into the lobby itself, indicated an architect who imagined a place where water did not freeze for a good chunk of the year.

    During the winter, that open-air atrium became a terrifying safety hazard. Take a look at this photo. Surrounded on all sides by warmed glass, the whole thing became a chimney. The heating pushed an enormous volume of air out the top and sucked gale force winds through the pictured entry-way.

    In the late 90s, Dalhousie fixed the problem, sealing the top of the atrium with glass. The result was a fully usable (safe) courtyard where students now congregate.

  4. So much depends on thoughtful design.

6 Points On a Continuum – Cyborgs & Architects 6

July 23rd, 2009 by Tim Maly

Part of a series: Cyborgs & Architects

Dark rain
Creative Commons License photo credit: kirainet

This’ll be the last explicit post about Cyborgs and Architects for awhile (here are parts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5). Having set up and then blurred a division between adapting people for the environment and adapting the environment for people, I’d like to point out some examples along the sliding scale between these two attitudes.

  1. Nadya Vessey, temporary mermaid.

    New Zealand’s WETA workshop built a mermaid suit for Vessey, a double leg amputee. I love everything about this story, especially the way it offers a glimpse of a future where enhancements are not merely restoring human capabilities but opportunities for creating whole new kinds of bodies, bringing aesthetics to cybernetics.

  2. Steve Mann, pioneer in wearable computing.

    You can see the evolution of his setup here. He has also done a lot of interesting work and activism around ubiquitous surveillance.

    I remember in 1996 trying to convince a bunch of skeptical law students that wearable computing would change the way they practiced the law.

    Now they all have blackberries.

  3. Kevin Warwick, cybernetic homesteader.

    In 1998, Dr Warwick had a chip implanted under his skin that let him control the building. The experiment brilliantly illustrates the blurring between architecture and cybernetics. Neither the smart building, nor the implant chip are worth anything on their own. But networked, the result is something special.

    His research continues.

  4. Kisho Kurokawa, metabolist.

    In 1972, his capsule tower was built. A explicitly modifiable structure, the intention was that the capsules would be replaced and updated over time, creating a long lasting building through its very mutability and flexibility.

    Here was an environment that would grow and adapt to its users. Sadly, it seems like the maintenance part didn’t go as planned and now the whole structure faces demolition.

  5. Minoru Yamasaki, modernist.

    Yamasaki is the architect of the destroyed WTC Towers, but I’m picking on him here for the disastrous Pruitt-Igoe public housing project. A lot of ink has been spilled about what went wrong, but in the end, the environment that had been constructed failed dramatically, becoming a symbol for the failure of the well-meaning but flawed modernist “machines for living” mentality.

    “I never thought people were that destructive,” lamented Yamasaki.

  6. Albert Speer, Nazi.

    Perhaps one of the leading examples of the idea that architecture can control people, Speer designed the Zeppelinfeld, the enormous stadium featured in The Triumph of the Will. Nazi architecture was predicated on the idea that it should not only serve the people, but also influence their mood and behaviours.

    For a smaller scale (and more benevolent) take, see also police commissioner William J. Bratton and the fixing broken windows theory.

All of: Cyborgs & Architects

The Invisible Infrastructure of Cyborgs – Cyborgs & Architects 5

July 21st, 2009 by Tim Maly

Part of a series: Cyborgs & Architects

Third Shift at the Robot Factory
Creative Commons License photo credit: ElDave

In 4 Jonah poked some holes the Architect half of the division I’d set up. I’d like to spend 5 looking at the Cyborg’s story.

In the first two Terminator movies, Arnold is cast as the classic cyborg, a nearly unstoppable man-machine. Incredibly durable and adaptable, he takes freely from his environment, arriving in the present literally naked and acquiring the equipment he needs along the way. He is supremely self-reliant.

Except.

Except that in order to show up in the present, there needed to be a working time machine. In order for him to even exist, there needed to be Skynet and enormous factories full of vats connected to assembly devices.

This is the invisible infrastructure of cyborgs.

Sometime in the 90s until 2006, the U.S. Army replaced “Be All You Can Be” with “Army of One”. Advertising for the campaign featured hardcore-looking soldiers with all sorts of high tech gear. The implication being that to join the Army of the 21st century, was to become a stupendous badass. (Sure there was some noise about the “one” being an acronym for “Officers, NCOs, and Enlisted” but who listens to acronyms?)

They certainly are. Consider the infamous Black Hawk Down incident. 18 U.S. soldiers died. Between 130 and 2,000 (that is not a typo) Somalis died. Brutal.

The U.S. Army is probably the most cybernetic military force, in their tendency to prefer increasingly high tech solutions to combat problems.

But a high tech military is supremely reliant on the support staff and logistics that comes with deploying and maintaining the equipment. The logistical operations of the army are dizzying in their complexity. Just getting all of the gear needed into the field is an overwhelming (and expensive) proposition.

The fact is that cybernetic beings can’t be self-reliant. It takes an enormous amount of institutionalized medicine and technology to make a working cyborg. The moment to moment self-reliance of the cyborg can be seen as a kind of infrastructural debt that must be paid back either at another time or by someone else. That someone else can be a willing participant, as in the crew of technicians building and maintaining Robocop between mission, or a victim, as in the hapless bikers who give Arnold the clothes he needs in Terminator.

In the penultimate issue if Warren Ellis’ run on Iron Man, Tony Stark has just taken the Extremis serum and is discovering his new powers.

Maya, I can see through satellites now,” he says.

Which is all well and good. So long as there are satellites.

All of: Cyborgs & Architects

« Previous Entries